Since November 8th, an incessant desire emerged among the internet intelligentsia to “break out of our media bubbles.” Apparently, on all sides of the political spectrum, echo chambers have emerged where people are only being exposed to ideas they already agree with. I disagree, and the title of this series is an attempt to explain why. In my experience, the left is consistently debating and interrogating itself
In my experience, the left is consistently debating and interrogating itself, trying to come to better understandings of political ideas that only emerged from the recesses of chat rooms and academic journals in the past ten years. Different priorities in leftist activisms come into conflict with one another and debates centre around both principles and ethics. Often times, these debates are actually based in the conflict between principles and ethics, how we can make broad political/ideological statements that fall apart under scrutiny.
This post is not going to examine any of these in particular. However, here I want to list out some of the topics that I will be covering on my own and invite anyone else who wants to contribute to do so (either here on this blog or elsewhere and would let me direct people to them). Here’s the list that I’ve been developing recently based on conversations I’ve had or witnessed online.
- Vegan Activism vs. Anti-Colonialism vs. Anti-Poverty
- Sexual Orientation Essentialism vs. Socialization
- Trans Identity Essentialism vs. Historical Construction and Re-Construction of Gender
- Rape Culture vs. Masculinity vs. Mental Illness
- Labour Movement vs. Post-Vocational Workforce
- Pro-Choice Freedoms vs. Ethical Parenting
- Representation on screen vs. Representation in industry
- Gentrification vs. Urban Development Theory
- Rape Culture vs. Drinking Culture vs. Casual Sex Culture
- Anarchism/Revolution vs. Safety and Justice
These are just the initial ideas, I’m sure more will hit the brain as I actually start writing.